GeoDynamics, Incorporated v. DynaEnergetics US, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant moves to exclude testimony of Dr. Raymundo Arroyave, one of Plain- tiff’s technical experts. Def.’s Mot. to Strike [Dkt. # 119]. First, Defendant complains that Arroyave relies on flawed and unreliable testimony of two other witnesses, John Hardesty and Dr. Vallerie DeLeon. Id. at 3–7. Second, Defendant contends Arroyave’s opinion con- tradicts the Court’s claim construction rulings. Id. at 7 –8. Finally, Defendant moves to strike Arroyave’s supplemental report as improper and untimely. Id. at 8–13. A. Dr.