Kaist IP US LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No. 2:16-cv-01314 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants ’1 Motion to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination (the “Motion to Stay”). (Dkt. No. 651.) Having considered the Motion to Stay, the Court is of the opinion that it should be and hereby is DENIED. Also before the Court are the following motions: (1) Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law o n Non-Infringement and Invalidity (the “Liability JMOL”) (Dkt. No. 578); (2) Samsung’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Ma tter of Law for Damages of No More Than $6.2 Million (the “Damages JMOL”) (Dkt. No.