Kaist IP US LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No. 2:16-cv-01314 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, KAIST moves for l eave to amend its infringement contentions to add over 100 allegedly infringing instrume ntalities. Pl.’s Mot. for Leave to Amend Infringement Disclosures [Dkt. # 192] at 9–13; see also Pl.’s Supp. Disclosure of Asserted Cl. & Infringement Contentions [Dkt. # 192-3 ] (redlining changes relative to KAIST’s original contentions). KAIST also seeks leave to now assert the doctrine of equivalents with respect to two claim limitations based on recent testimony by a Globalfoundries Rule 30(b)(6) witness. Pl.’s Mot.