Kaist IP US LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No. 2:16-cv-01314 (E.D. Tex. June 5, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, Defendants move to exclude certain portions of Roy Weinstein’s damages report. Defs.’ Mot. to Exclude [Dkt. # 225]. Weinstein opines that Defendants owe at least $1.5 billion in damages for infringement. According to Defendants, however, “Weinstein’s opinions are divorced from the patent-in-suit and violate basic principles of patent damages law articulated by the Federal Circuit.” Id. at 2. After full briefing by the parties, the Court will DENY the motion. * * * Defendants identify five issues with Weinstein’s report.