Kaist IP US LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No. 2:16-cv-01314 (E.D. Tex. May 17, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff moves, for three reasons, to exclude certain opinions of Dr. Vivek Subramanian, Defendants’ technical expert on invalidity of the asserted claims. Pl.’s Mot. [Dkt. # 220]. First, Plaintiff contends Subramanian’s report includes indefiniteness contentions already resolved by the Court during claim construction. Id. at 3–4. Second, Plaintiff contends the report includes a new and untimely indefiniteness contention that should not be considered. Id. at 4–5.