Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Kaist IP US LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, No. 2:16-cv-01314 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2018)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Discovery
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01314, Dkt. No. 348
Decided
April 17, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 215 Opposed SEALED PATENT MOTION for Leave to Supplement Expert Reports of David B. Witt and Roy Weinstein filed by KAIST IP US LLC
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 / 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION KAIST IP US LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § No. 2:16-CV-01314-JRG-RSP § SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., § LTD., et al., § § Defendants. § MEMORANDUM OPINION In this patent case, KAIST moves for leave to supplement two of its expert reports based on purportedly new assertions from Defendants. Pl.’s Mot. for Leave to Supplement [Dkt. # 215]. The Court will GRANT the motion IN PART. I. BACKGROUND KAIST asserts U.S.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case