Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01366 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01366, Dkt. No. 512
Decided
March 4, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - denying 507 Emergency SEALED PATENT MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE NEW EXPERT REPORT OF PMCS SUBSTITUTE DAMAGES EXPERT MICHAEL PELLEGRINO
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s Emergency Motion to Strike Portions of the New Expert Report of PMC’s Substitute Damages Expert Michael Pellegrino (“Motion”). Dkt. No. 507. The Court previously granted a motion to designate Mr. Michael Pellegrino as a substitute expert under certain stipulations. Dkt. No. 506. Apple now moves the Court to strike portions of Mr. Pellegrino’s expert report as well as strike certain redactions of PMC’s previous damages expert report. See Dkt. No. 507 at 9. Apple’s Motion is DENIED. I.