Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01366 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On June 28, 2016, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed terms in four patents. The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 148, 160, 161, 162, and 163) and arguments. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015).