Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01366 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 19, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01366, Dkt. No. 486
Decided
February 19, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 273 Opposed SEALED PATENT MOTION to Exclude Certain Opinions of PMC's Damages Expert Michael Dansky filed by Apple, Inc
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of PMC ’s Damages Expert Michael Dansky filed by Defendant Apple, Inc. Dkt. No. 273. Apple moves to strike portions of the testimony of Mr. Michael Dansky, Plaintiff Personalized Media Communications, LLC ’s (“PMC”) damages expert. See Dkt. No. 273 at 51. I. BACKGROUND On October 10, 2016, PMC ’s damages expert, Mr. Dansky, served his damages report estimating Apple’s alleged infringement of the asserted patents. Mr.