Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01366 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01366, Dkt. No. 459
Decided
January 29, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Personalized Media Communications, LLC’s (“PMC”) Motion to Strike Apple Inc.’s Undisclosed Invalidity Theories (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 254.) Having considered the Motion, the related briefing, and the relevant authority, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND & PARTY ARGUMENTS A. PMC’s Arguments PMC moves to strike Apple’s undisclosed invalidity theories, arguing that invalidity theories not specifically disclosed until service of the expert report of Anthony Wechselberger should be struck.