Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01366 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 29, 2016)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01366, Dkt. No. 230
Decided
September 29, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 209 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report an d Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne (Dkt. No. 209) recommen ding that Apple Inc.’s Rule 12 (b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No s. 14, 34) be denied because the asserted patents are directed to patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Find ing no objections, and reviewing the record de novo, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s Rep ort and Recommendation should be ADOPTED.