Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-01366 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 19, 2021)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01366, Dkt. No. 487
Decided
February 19, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 275 SEALED PATENT MOTION to Strike Testimony of Vincent A. Thomas filed by Personalized Media Communications, LLC
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Testimony of Vincent A. Thomas filed by Plaintiff Personalized Media Communications, LLC ( “PMC”). Dkt. No. 275. PMC moves to strike the testimony of Mr. Vincent A. Thomas , Apple, Inc.’s damages expert. See Dkt. No. 275 at 51. The Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND On October 10, 2016, PMC ’s damages expert, Mr. Michael J. Dansky ( “Mr. Dansky”), served his damages report detailing Apple’s alleged infringement of the asserted patents. See Dkt, No. 275 at 5. Mr.