Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Metaswitch Networks Ltd v. Genband US LLC et al, No. 2:14-cv-00744 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 10, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00744, Dkt. No. 322
Decided
March 10, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 176 Genband's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 8 of the '640 Patent; denying 255 Genband's Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding CableLabs
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Patent No. 8, 687,640 filed by Genband US LLC (“Genband”). (Dkt. No. 176). Also before the Court is Genaband’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the CableLabs Defenses. (Dkt. No. 255). Metaswitch Networks Ltd. (“Metaswitch”) opposes both motions. I. LAW Summary judgment should be granted “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a).