Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Metaswitch Networks Ltd v. Genband US LLC et al, No. 2:14-cv-00744 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2016)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Claim Construction Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00744, Dkt. No. 312
Decided
March 8, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Dr. Vijay K. Madisetti Regarding the ’667 Patent filed by Genband US, LLC (“Genband”) . (Dkt. No. 171; Motion to Strike). Metaswitch Networks Ltd. (“Metaswitch”) opposes the motion. I. LAW Rule 702 provides that an expert witness may offer opinion testimony if (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient…

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case