Metaswitch Networks Ltd v. Genband US LLC et al, No. 2:14-cv-00744 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 5, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

B efore the Court is a Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Dr. Nader Mir filed by Genband US LLC (“Genband”). (Dkt. No. 172; “Motion to Strike”). Genband moves to strike two opinions from Dr. Mir’s Report: (1) his rebuttal to Mr. Bress’s Vanmoor anticipation opinions in which Dr. Mir states that “ anticipation requires a showing that each element of the claim at issue, properly construed, is found in a single prior art referenc e,” and (2) Dr. Mir’s opinions that the asserted claims of Patent No.