Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Metaswitch Networks Ltd v. Genband US LLC et al, No. 2:14-cv-00744 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00744, Dkt. No. 324
Decided
March 11, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a Motion to Strike the Supplemental Expert Report of Mark Lanning filed by Metaswitch Networks Ltd. (“Metaswitch”) . (Dkt. No. 284). Also before the Court is Metaswitch’s Motion to Strike the Supplemental Rebuttal Report of Christopher Bakewell. (Dkt. No. 302). Genband US, LLC (“Genband”) opposes these motions. I. LAW A party must disclose the opinions of its experts “at the times and in the sequence that the court orders.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D).