Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Metaswitch Networks Ltd v. Genband US LLC et al, No. 2:14-cv-00744 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 5, 2016)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00744, Dkt. No. 296
Decided
March 5, 2016
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 174 Sealed Motion to Strike Mr. Mark Lanning
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a Motion to E xclude Testimony of Expert Witness Mark Lanning filed by Metaswitch Networks Ltd. (“Metaswitch”) . (Dkt. No. 174; “Motion to Strike”). Metaswitch moves to strike Mr. Lanning’s opinion on “copying” and “commercial success.” Metaswitch argues that Mr. Lanning’s copying opinions are fundamentally the same as those he offered in the co-pending case Genband v. Metaswitch, Case No. 2:14- cv-33 (“the -33 C ase”).