Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Metaswitch Networks Ltd v. Genband US LLC et al, No. 2:14-cv-00744 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2016)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:14-cv-00744, Dkt. No. 367
Decided
April 11, 2016
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 288 Report and Recommendations, 293 Report and Recommendations,
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommend ation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne on March 1, 2016 (Dkt. No. 288) which recomme nds that Genband’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 173) be denied as moot b ecause the Court lacks jurisdiction over Genband’s declaratory judgment counterclaim for invalid ity of U.S. Patent No. 7,657,018. No objections having been filed and for the reasons set fort h in the Court’s Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is adopted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Genband’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No.