Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alfonso Cioffi et al v. Google, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 341
Decided
August 26, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING DEFENDANTS RULE 50(B) MOTIONS BASED ON 35 U.S.C. § 251 AND THE RULE AGAINST RECAPTURE SUPPORTED BY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Length
66 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

AND MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S RULE 50(B) MOTIONS BASED ON 35 U.S.C. § 251 AND THE RULE AGAINST RECAPTURE SUPPORTED BY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Court held a jury trial in this case from February 6 to 10, 2017. (Dkt. Nos. 255–58, 261). At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a unanimous verdict finding that the patents asserted by Plaintiffs Alfonso Cioffi, Melanie Rozman, Megan Rozman, and Morgan Rozman (collectively, “ Plaintiffs”) against Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) were infringed and not invalid. (Dkt.