Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alfonso Cioffi et al v. Google, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 19, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 226
Decided
January 19, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 212 Report and Recommendations, 208 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Payne (Dkt. No. 212) recommending denial of Defendant Goog le’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 251 and Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 148). Also before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by Judge Payne (Dkt. No. 208) recommending denial of Google’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Subjec t-Matter Ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 149). Having considered the Objections filed by Google (Dkt. Nos.