Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alfonso Cioffi et al v. Google, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 9, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 209
Decided
January 9, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiffs currently allege that Google’s Chrome web browser infringes seven claims— claims 43 and 70 of U.S. Patent No. RE 43,500, claims 5 and 67 of U.S. Patent No. RE 43,528, and claims 30, 38, and 49 of U.S. Patent No. RE 43,529, all of which relate to computer program products and methods for managing malware downloaded from a network. See Dkt. 180. Google moves to exclude the opinions of Plaintiffs’ damages expert, Mr. Walter Bratic, under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert. Dkt. 151.