Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alfonso Cioffi et al v. Google, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 12, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 307
Decided
September 12, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING ONGOING ROYALTY AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES re 277 SEALED PATENT MOTION filed by Morgan Rozman, Megan Rozman, Melanie Rozman, Alfonso Cioffi
Length
20 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Ongoing Royalty (Dkt. No. 277 ) filed by Plaintiffs Alfonso Cioffi, Melanie Rozman, Megan Rozman, and Morgan Rozman (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs seek imposition of an ongoing royalty for any continued infringement by Defendant Google, Inc. (“Google”), as well as a corresponding reporting requirement. Having considered the Motion, the Parties’ briefing, and the relevant authorities, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED AS MODIFIED .