Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Alfonso Cioffi et al v. Google, LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:13-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 340
Decided
August 26, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW re 292 Motion for Post-Trial Relief
Length
66 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

AND MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S RULE 50(B) MOTIONS BASED ON 35 U.S.C. § 251 AND THE RULE AGAINST RECAPTURE SUPPORTED BY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Court held a jury trial in this case from February 6 to 10, 2017. (Dkt. Nos. 255–58, 261). At the conclusion of the trial, the jury returned a unanimous verdict finding that the patents asserted by Plaintiffs Alfonso Cioffi, Melanie Rozman, Megan Rozman, and Morgan Rozman (collectively, “ Plaintiffs”) against Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) were infringed and not invalid. (Dkt.