Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Third-Party Plaintiff G oogle Inc.’s (“Google”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Expenses and Motion for Entry of Judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 537, 540.) Having considered the parties’ wr itten submissions, the Court GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Google’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Expenses, and GRANTS-IN-PART and DENIES-IN-PART Google’s Motion for Entry of Judgment. I. BACKGROUND This is a breach of contract case arising from a Settlement Agreement that Google and Beneficial Innovations, Inc.