Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Beneficial’s “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings re Count II in Google’s Complaint in Intervention (for Attorney’s Fees Under Texas Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §28.001(8))” (Dkt. No. 384, filed Octobe r 14, 2013). The Magist rate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be granted. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 462, filed December 10, 2013). No portion of the Report and Recommendation wa s objected to. The Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED.