Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00229, Dkt. No. 501
Decided
January 20, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 499 Motion for Reconsideration
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is both Beneficial I nnovations’ Objections to, and Motion for Reconsideration of, the January 10, 2014 Order Re Ad missibility of Exhibits at Trial (Dkt. No. 499, filed January, 19 2014) and Google Inc.’s Response to Plaintiff’s Objections to, and Motion for Reconsideration of, the Janua ry 10, 2014 Order Re Admissibility of Exhibits at Trial (Dkt. No.