Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2014)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00229, Dkt. No. 634
Decided
August 22, 2014
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Length
29 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DI STRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, v. BENEFICIAL INNOVATIONS, INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-00229-JRG-RSP MEMORANDUM AND OPINION On January 23, 2014, after a three day jury trial, a jury reached a verdict regarding Google Inc.’s (“Google”) breach of contract claim agains t Beneficial Innovations, Inc. (“Beneficial”). (See Dkt. No.