Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00229, Dkt. No. 482
Decided
January 6, 2014
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
38 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

2 BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Beneficial In novations, Inc. (hereinafter “BI”) filed suit against Defendants on April 20, 2011, asserting U.S. Patent No. 6,712,702 (“ the ‘702 Patent”), entitled “Method and System For Playing Game s On A Network,” and U.S. Patent No. 7,496,943 (“the ‘943 Patent”), entitled “Network System For Presenting Advertising.” Collectively, the ‘702 Patent and the ‘943 Patent are referred to herein as “the patents-in- suit.” On June 25, 2013, the Court held a Markman hearing in the case (Dkt.