Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Advance Publications, Inc. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00229 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2014)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Amazon’s “Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness” (Dkt. No. 307, filed May 30, 2013). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 466, filed December 13, 2013). After reviewing the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendati on should be, and is hereby, ADOPTED. Accordingly, Beneficial’s “Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefinite ness” (Dkt. No.