Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pact XPP Technologies, AG v. Xilinx, Inc., et al, No. 2:07-cv-00563 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00563, Dkt. No. 444
Decided
September 3, 2013
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
22 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ equitable de fenses of laches and unclean hands. For the following reasons, the Court rejects both defenses. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A. Lawsuit and the Asserted Patents This lawsuit was filed by PACT XPP Technol ogies, AG against defendants Xilinx, Inc. and Avnet, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) on December 28, 2007. In May 2012, a jury found that Defendants infringe claims 1, 3, 17, and 30 of the ’181 patent and claim 8 of the ’106 patent. United States Patent No.