Pact XPP Technologies, AG v. Xilinx, Inc., et al, No. 2:07-cv-00563 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff PACT XPP Technologies, AG’s Motion to Exclude Robert Münch. Dkt. No. 179. Also before the C ourt are Defendants’ response, Plaintiff =s reply, and Defendants= sur-reply. Dkt. Nos. 203, 216 & 236. Having considered the briefing and all relevant papers and pleadings, the Court finds that Plaintiff =s motion should be GRANTED AS MODIFIED.