Pact XPP Technologies, AG v. Xilinx, Inc., et al, No. 2:07-cv-00563 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 26, 2012)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Certain Expert Opinions of Defendants’ Expert Mr. McAlexander (Dkt. No. 174, filed Ma y 26, 2011). Having considered the briefing and the argument heard during the pretrial conference held on April 18, 2012, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. DISCUSSION Defendants have retained Joseph McAlexan der as an expert in this case. Mr. McAlexander has submitted a report disclosing his expert opinions regarding the invalidity of the asserted patents. Dkt. No.