Pact XPP Technologies, AG v. Xilinx, Inc., et al, No. 2:07-cv-00563 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 27, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion fo r a New Trial (Dkt. No. 398, filed June 25, 2012). Defendants request a new tr ial on the issues of infringeme nt, willful infringement, and invalidity on the grounds that the Defendants were substantially prejudiced by the improper exclusion of evidence. (Mot. at 2.) PACT argue s that Defendants are not entitled to a new trial because the evidence was properly excluded and Defendants cannot demonstrate any prejudice resulting from the evidence’s exclusion. (Resp.