Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Pact XPP Technologies, AG v. Xilinx, Inc., et al, No. 2:07-cv-00563 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 11, 2012)

Denied
Daubert / Expert Challenges Discovery
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:07-cv-00563, Dkt. No. 321
Decided
April 11, 2012
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - PACT XPP Technologies, AGs Motion to Exclude the Expert Disclosure of Dr. Trimberger (Dkt. No. 176) and its Motion to Exclude the Rebuttal Disclosure of Dr. Stephen Trimberger (Dkt. No. 177) are DENIED
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Xilinx, Inc. and Avnet, Inc. have identified Dr. Stephen Trimberger as a fact witness and an expert witness that they may call to testify at trial. Dr. Trimberger is an engineer at Xilinx, who has been with the company since 1988. Dkt. No. 176, Ex. A at 2. Dr. Trimberger holds several degrees, including a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the California Institute of Technology. Id. at 1. Defendants have submitted an init ial expert disclosure (Dkt. No. 176-1), a rebuttal expert disclosure (Dkt . No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case