Pact XPP Technologies, AG v. Xilinx, Inc., et al, No. 2:07-cv-00563 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 3, 2013)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is PACT XPP Technologies , AG’s Motion for Atto rney’s Fees (Dkt. No. 401, filed June 27, 2012). The jury found that Xilinx willfully infringed claims 1, 3, 17, and 30 of U.S. Patent No. 6,119,181, and claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 6,338,108. (Verdict, Dkt. No. 370.) The jury awarded $15,399,900 as a reasonable royalty. ( Id.) The Court has denied Xilinx’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Ma tter of Law of No-Willfulness, and in the Alternative, for a New Trial. ( See Mem. Order, Dkt. No.