Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. Apple, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as to Non- Infringement and Motion for New Trial (Dkt . No. 443 (“JMOL Mot.”)) and Motion for New Trial on Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 444 (“New Tria l Mot.”)) filed by Plaintiff Core Wireless S.A.R.L. (“Core”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that Core’s Motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The Court held a jury trial in this case an d the jury returned a unanimous verdict on March 9, 2015, that Apple had not infringed U.S. Patent No.