Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. Apple, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2015)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 466
Decided
August 11, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 440 Sealed Motion to Lift the Stay and for Dismissal and/or Summary Judgment on Core Wirelesss Portfolio Contract and Unjust Enrichment Claims
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Lift the Stay and for Dismissal and/or Summary Judgment on Core Wireless’s Portfolio Contract and Unjust Enrichment Claims (Dkt. No. 440) (hereinafter, “Motion”) filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”). Plaintiff Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. (“Core”) opposes the Motion for Dismissal and/ or Summary Judgment on Core’s Portfolio Contract and Unjust Enrichment Claims.