Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. Apple, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2015)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Bill of Costs (Dkt. No. 441) (“Mot.”). Plain tiff Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. (“Core”) opposes the motion. The Court, having reviewed th e Parties’ briefing and the evidence in light of the applicable law, finds, for the reasons stated below, that Apple’s motion (Dkt. No. 441) should be DENIED-IN-PART and GRANTED-IN-PART. APPLE’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES “A court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.” 35 U.S.C. § 285.