Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. Apple, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. July 17, 2014)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 245
Decided
July 17, 2014
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court interprets the claim language in this case in the manner set forth in this Order
Length
44 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This claim construction Opinion construes terms in United States Patent Nos. 6,792,277 (“the ‘277 P atent”), 7,383,022 (“the ‘ 022 Patent”), 7,599,664 (“the ‘ 664 Patent”), 6,978,143 (“the ‘143 Patent”), 6,788,959 (“the ‘959 Patent”), 6,674,860 (“the ‘860 Patent”), and 7,804,850 (“the ‘850 Patent”). Plaintiff Core Wireless Licensing, S.a.r.l. (“Core”) alleges Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) infringes the ‘ 277, ‘022, ‘664, ‘143, ‘959, ‘860, and the ‘ 850 P atents (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”).