Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l. v. Apple, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00100 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2013)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00100, Dkt. No. 73
Decided
February 22, 2013
Judge
John D. Love, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, ORDER DENYING Apples Motion to Transfer Venue AND the Motion for Oral Hearing is DENIED
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404 (a) (Doc. N o. 33) (“ MOTION”). Plain tiff Core Wireless Licensing S.a.r.l (“Core Wireless”) filed a response (Doc. No. 39) (“ RESPONSE”) to which Apple replied (Doc. No. 41) (“ REPLY”) and Core Wireless filed a Sur -Reply (Doc. No. 43) (“ SUR-REPLY”). After considering the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES Apple’s Motion to Transfer Venue. Apple further requested an oral hearing on its Transfer Motion (Doc. No. 33).