Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobility Workx, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc et al, No. 4:17-cv-00872 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00872, Dkt. No. 175
Decided
November 18, 2019
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED Mobility Workx, LLC's Motion Requesting an Adverse Inference Jury Instruction be Given Pursuant to FRCP 37(C) (Dkt. #168) is DENIED
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Mobility Workx, LLC’s Motion Requesting an Adverse Inference Jury Instruction be Given Pursuant to FRCP 37(C) (Dkt. #168). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that Mobility Workx’ Motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND Mobility Workx, due to what it claims is intentional bad -faith conduct on Verizon’s part, requests that an adverse inference instruction be given to the jury.