Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobility Workx, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc et al, No. 4:17-cv-00872 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 15, 2019)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00872, Dkt. No. 74
Decided
March 15, 2019
Judge
See opinion
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the constructions set forth in this opinion for the disputed terms of the patents-in-suit. The parties are ordered that they may not refer, directly or indirectly, to each ot…
Length
31 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Plaintiff Mobility Workx , LLC’ s (“Plaintiff’s” or “ Mobility’s”) Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #48), Defendant Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless’s (“Defendant’s” or “Verizon’s”) Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #62), and Plaintiff’s Reply Cl aim Constru ction Brief (Dkt. # 64). Also before the Court are the parties’ September 19 , 2018 Joint Claim Con struction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. #42) and the parties’ February 25, 2019 Joint Claim Construction Chart (Dkt. #68, Ex. A) .