Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobility Workx, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc et al, No. 4:17-cv-00872 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 5, 2019)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00872, Dkt. No. 167
Decided
November 5, 2019
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion to Strike and Exclude Certain Portions of the Expert Testimony of Sukumaran Nair, Ph.D. (Dkt. #99) DENIED in part. Defendant's Motion to Strike the Expert Disclosure of Dr. Sumi Helal and Dr.…
Length
44 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Strike and Exclude Certain Portions of the Expert Testimony of Sukumaran Nair, Ph.D. (Dkt. #99); Defendant’s Motion to Strike the Expert Disclosure of Dr. Sumi Helal and Dr. Edwin Hernandez (Dkt. #101); Defendant Verizon Wireless’s Motion to Exclude the Opinion of Dr. Edwin A. Hernandez (Dkt. #102); and Plaintiff Mobility Workx, LLC’s Motion to Strike Portions of James Proctor’s Expert Report (Dkt. #104).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case