Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobility Workx, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc et al, No. 4:17-cv-00872 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 18, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00872, Dkt. No. 174
Decided
November 18, 2019
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Partially Strike Plaintiff's Witness List is DENIED (Dkt. #159)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a simple question: whether Mobility Workx is entitled to call Newton as a witness to testify to the T -Mobile License. There are two competing interests at work here. On one hand, there is the right to counsel-of-choice, when permissible. See F.D.I.C. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 50 F.3d 1304 (5th Ci r. 1995). On the other hand, there is the right to offer relevant evidence that either supports one’s case or qualifies, explains, or puts in context otherwise prejudicial evidence . FED. R. EVID. 402.