Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Mobility Workx, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc et al, No. 4:17-cv-00872 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 11, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:17-cv-00872, Dkt. No. 141
Decided
September 11, 2019
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendant Cellco Partnership D/B/A Verizon Wireless' Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. #95) is hereby DENIED
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Cellco Partnership D/B/A Verizon Wireless’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Non -Infringement (Dkt. #95). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion should be denied. LEGAL STANDARD The purpose of summary judgment is to isolate and dispose of factually unsupported claims or defenses. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323–24 (1986).