Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 7, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 374
Decided
April 7, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 173 Sealed Motion
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC’s Motion to Exclude or Strike Certain Rebuttal Expert Opinions of Philip W. Kline. Dkt. No. 173. In the Motion, Headwater challenges Mr . Kline ’s opinions on t wo bases: First, that Mr . Kline lacks the experience and qualifications to offer opinions and about consumer survey designs, and second, that Mr. Kline’s opinions are duplicative of Samsung ’s other expert opinions . Id. at 1. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the Motion. I.