Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 415
Decided
April 20, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Memorandum Order 377 and OVERRULES Samsung's Objections 401
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff H eadwater Research LLC p reviously filed a Motion to Strike Certain O pinions of Samsung’s Damages Expert Dr. M. Ray Perryman P h.D. (Dkt. No. 182. ) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 377), gr anting Headwater’s M otion to Strike only to the extent t hat D r. Perryman’s opinions rely on Dr. Foster’s stricken opinions. Samsung has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case