Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 1, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 365
Decided
April 1, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 178 SEALED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY FOR LACK OF WRITTEN DESCRIPTION BASED ON 35 U.S.C. § 112 filed by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.. Objections due within 14 …
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Lack of Written Description Based on 35 U.S.C. § 112. Dkt. No. 178. The Motion should be denied because there is a genuine dispute of material fact. I. LEGAL STANDARD A. SUMMARY JUDGMENT Summary judgment should be granted “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Any evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to t he nonmovant. See Anderson v.