Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 407
Decided
April 20, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 365 and denying 178 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Lack of Written Description Based on 35 U.S.C. § 112
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Samsung previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Lack of Written Description Based on 35 U.S.C. § 112. (Dkt. No. 178.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 365), recommending denial of Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED tha t the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No.178) is DENIED.