Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 413
Decided
April 20, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Memorandum Order 376 and OVERRULES Samsung's Objections 400
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Samsung previously filed a Daubert Motion to Strike Expert Report of Dr. A ndreas Groehn (Dkt. No. 181.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 376), denying Samsung’s Motion to Strike. Samsung has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 400.) After reviewing the briefing on the Motion to Strike, Judge Payne’s Memorandum Order, and the briefing on Samsung’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Memorandum Order and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Memora…